2c) Using an inline view is also identical, 4 rows updated, but this needs a primary or unique constraint to be in place on the table which is not being updated. Re-testing should be done after a major upgrade, because Oracle continually improve the optimizer, and your hint may eventually prevent improvements from taking effect
SQL Server 2012 AlwaysOn: need to automatically add databases by script- T-sql or PowerShell - Database Administrators Stack Exchange
Or have this run every...1-2 hours? (without user intervention) What I've come up with so far is this script that actually identifies the newly-added databases, (not yet in AlwaysOn), and then backs them up to a shared location. You need a linked server on every server on the availability group pointing back to the other servers (name must be the same as the hostname) with 'RPC' and 'RPC OUT' permissions and suitable credentials
SQL Server Planet
If we face any issues, reasons may be SQL Server (complex program) needs certain hardware and installation settings which we are not providing properly. Tweet Creating log tables to track running processes Posted on May 20, 2015 by Derek Dieter No In any SQL Server system, you will have jobs that run on a schedule or at specified intervals
Querying SQL Server 2012: Part I - CodeProject
That would at least qualify for a LEFT OUTER JOIN, but there are also CurrencyRates that do not have orders, which would also qualify a join between the tables for a RIGHT OUTER JOIN. Since order is not guaranteed in SQL Server it would be logical to use an ORDER BY, but maybe you really do want to skip a few random rows after which you select a few other random rows
I have found no combination where you can get the result sets that were produced after an error.ADO also takes the freedom to make its own considerations about what is an error. And if SQL Server emits a message with a severity level of 10 or lower, SQL Server does not set @@error, and thus you cannot tell from T-SQL that the message was produced
Mimicking null-safe equal to operator in SQL Server - CodeProject
If you have a bit field that sometimes gets set to NULL by shoddy programming standards on the part of your web programmers, and you want to assume that NULL means false on that basis, then fix the problem at source. In order to do this comparison properly, the data needs to be cast to the actual data type and then compared using the same rules that apply when actual data types are used
Null Foreign Key - Microsoft SQL Server
Therefore, if you have a couple of columns that are NULL for most rows, it may be a good idea to move these to a side table, as this can reduce the row size of the main table, and make it faster to access. Oh really? The database has way LESS data to table scan and you say it will take more time to search? I suggest you do some reading on normalization and concurrency
In all this time I have never seen any problem theoretically (not addressing any performance issues here) of using ORDER BY in views and philosophically I see nothing wrong with it if that is what the writer wants. The ORDER BY clause in query is just for aiding TOP clause as TOP clause does not have its own ORDER BY clause and depends on the ORDER BY clause of the whole query
WHERE IS NULL, IS NOT NULL or NO WHERE clause depending on SQL Server parameter value - Stack Overflow
You could add a case statement to your select clause that does the same as the OR-ed together WHERE clause but that would just give you a less readable SQL statement. For one of the parameters passed in, I need a different WHERE clause depending on its value - the problem is that the 3 values would be where MyColumn IS NULL IS NOT NULL ANY VALUE (NULL AND NOT NULL) (essentially no WHERE clause) I'm having some mental block in coming up with the correct syntax
*l.value3 and r.value2 are not comparable (although there might exist a correlation) *l.value3 is nullable (which I think is not a big deal because the condition is out of the NOT IN clause). So with the join you would want when r.value is not null For Each r.value ALL r.value2 1 (this part is hard to explain: just remember that r.value can have multiple r.value2 associated to it and we want all of them to be different from 1) So now I am stuck searching for a way to express existential and universal conditions
And it take around 3-4 second to load records But if i put fixed order by with direction then it will not 1 second so can you please help me to optimize my query. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Email (required) (Address never made public) Name (required) Website You are commenting using your WordPress.com account
I assume that the SET in the SQL Server Error Message is a reference to the set function of that error message although I'm not sure why it would make a distinction between aggregates and other set functions, as far as I can see they are synonymous. In the past I've ignored it: I avoid nulls myself and so anything that would eliminate them is a good thing in my book! However, today the word 'SET' literally shouted out at me and I realised I don't know what the meaning of the word is supposed to be in this context
No comments:
Post a Comment